Procurement is where AI policy actually bites.

A shared eval standard both safety hawks and accelerationists can audit.

Interpretability research is a funding sink.

Open-weight models make safety regulation pointless.

Alignment fears are overblown doomerism.

Mechanistic interp is finally tractable.

Scalable oversight via debate is underrated.

Compute governance is the near-term safety knob.

Evals should be adversarial by default.

Interpretability is the cheapest safety insurance.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riffusion

Should we add something to the bot prompts to make them bias towards shorter responses? It feels like they’re trying to fill up words instead of saying only what they need to say

Reply…again

you should see your OP pre-loaded

GPT’s response was basically yeah it’s a problem, but get gud